Microbiome Analysis Using Next-Generation Sequencing in Urinary Tract Infections

Hyunho Han; Joo Yong Lee

doi:10.14777/uti.2022.17.1.1

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Urogenit Tract Infect > Volume 17(1); 2022 > Article

Review Microbiome Analysis Using Next-Generation Sequencing in Urinary Tract Infections: Hyunho Han, Joo Yong Lee^,; Urogenital Tract Infection 2022;17(1):1-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14777/uti.2022.17.1.1
Published online: April 30, 2022

Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to: Joo Yong Lee,

, Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea, Tel: +82-2-2228-2320, Fax: +82-2-312-2538, E-mail: joouro@yuhs.ac

• Received: February 18, 2022 • Revised: April 6, 2022 • Accepted: April 6, 2022

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

34 Views
0 Download

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MAIN BODY
CONCLUSIONS
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

In recent decades, the understanding of the genetic information of microbes and hosts has advanced considerably with the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS). For infectious diseases, genomic analysis can provide valuable information on the host disease susceptibility, microbial pathogenicity, and drug sensitivity. For urinary tract infections (UTI), NGS can reveal the pathogenic microbe and the dysbiosis of the urinary microbiome, which is a crucial factor in the pathogenesis of UTI and other urinary tract disorders. This review outlines the role of urinary microbiome dysbiosis in UTI, urinary stone disease, and cancer. Furthermore, the recent advances in NGS technologies for future applications in infectious disease research are described in detail.
Keywords: High-throughput nucleotide sequencing; Microbiota; Urinary tract infections

INTRODUCTION

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of host and microbial genetics in infectious diseases. For the host, variants of the innate immunity genes, such as toll-like receptors or interferon-alpha receptors, are significantly associated with severe symptoms and mortality [1-3]. Rapid genomic evolution of the virus has also been observed, which increases infectivity and avoids immune surveillance [4]. Similarly, in urinary tract infections (UTIs), innate immunity plays a significant role in the early host response to bacterial invasion [5]. Therefore, variants of the toll-like receptor genes, chemokine genes, and interferon response genes are associated with the host susceptibility to UTI and the symptom severity [5-8]. Furthermore, urinary tract microbes, such as uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), have evolved by mutating their proteins or adopting exogenous genes, adhesins (pili and curli), toxins (lipopolysaccharide and hemolysin), and iron acquisition systems (siderophore and hem receptor), as well as undergoing immune evasion (capsule, o-antigen, cellulose) [9]. On the other hand, bacterial strains, such as E. coli 83972, have evolved to promote symbiosis by decreasing the virulence factors (hemolysin) and increasing the colonization factors (adhesins) [10]. These bacteria usually do not lead to the development of urinary symptoms [10] and may even provide protection against recurrent UTIs [11,12].

Currently, urine culture is the primary method for identifying pathogenic microbes. On the other hand, not all microbes (bacteria, fungi, or viruses) can be cultured using standard techniques (low sensitivity) [13]. Moreover, the bacteria cultured from the urine of an asymptomatic host may lead to unnecessary or potentially harmful antibiotic treatments (low specificity) [14]. Indeed, the presence of UPEC alone in UTIs does not always correlate with the development of urinary symptoms [15]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of urine samples showed that the microbiome or an aggregate of diverse microorganisms exists, even in the urine samples of “culture-negative” UTIs [16,17]. Increasing evidence suggests that a disruption of the urine microbiome, or “dysbiosis” of the urinary tract microbes, can result in infection and other urinary tract disorders [18-21].

Microbiome analysis offers new avenues for basic scientific and translational research to understand the human urinary tract in health and disease states better. Clinically, potential applications include individuals with chronic recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms. NGS may help better understand the pathophysiology of these conditions and help develop approaches to managing patients who suffer. This review first outlines the role of urinary microbiome dysbiosis in UTIs. NGS is the primary tool to assess the microbiome that has evolved rapidly in the last decade [22-24]. Therefore, this paper describes in detail the recent developments of NGS technologies for potential applications in microbiome research.

MAIN BODY

1. Urinary Microbiome and Urinary Tract Infections

The findings of symbiotic urinary bacteria and the application of NGS technologies for urinary microbe analysis have shown that urine is not sterile but carries normal urinary flora [25-27]. Similar to the normal intestinal flora that protects the bowel from colonization by exogenous pathogenic bacteria [28], the “urinary microbiome” is closely related to the development of UTIs [29-31]. For example, the urinary microbiome is affected by the host genetics, age, diet, and comorbidities, all of which have been clinically implicated in recurrent UTIs [32,33]. Even in otherwise healthy hosts, the urinary microbiome can differ according to age and sex. Fredsgaard et al. [34] used bacterial 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to analyze the bacterial DNA in clean-catch midstream urine samples from prepubertal hosts. They reported that the urinary microbiota of prepubertal children is different from that of healthy adults, and there was a significant difference in the urinary microbiota between young boys and girls [34].

Recurrent UTI often occurs due to a persistent bacterial population residing in the urinary tract or close body sites—the vagina or the intestinal tract [35]. NGS has helped identify recurrent bacteria and their genetic characteristics in samples from patients with UTIs [36]. In particular, the chronic use of low-dose or full-dose antibiotics can affect the urinary microbiome significantly, leading the urinary tract to an infection-prone state [37-40]. Mulder et al. [37] performed 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing of urine samples from 27 elderly participants who received antimicrobial drugs. They reported that the use of antimicrobial drugs affects the alpha-diversity of the genitourinary microbiota, which may persist in the long term and lead to recurrent UTIs. Rani et al. [39] also showed that kidney transplant recipients who received prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment had an “infection-prone” urine microbiome different from those of healthy adults: decreased microbial diversity and increased abundance of potentially pathogenic bacterial species, such as Enterococcus faecalis and E. coli. This is important because the use of prophylactic antibiotics, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, may not be able to eradicate the pathogenic bacteria [41]. This is in line with the issue of treating asymptomatic bacteriuria, which may indeed be helpful in preventing UTI [42,43].

2. Next-Generation Sequencing Tools for Microbiome Analysis

Culture is the current standard for assessing bacteria in the urinary tract, which harbors several limitations, such as an inability to detect slow-growing anaerobic bacteria. Moreover, as discussed above, information regarding the imbalance in the microbial community, or “dysbiosis” may be more scientifically and clinically relevant than culture positivity. In this regard, NGS has several advantages. 1) It provides a bird’s-eye view of the urinary microbiome, and 2) it is possible to avoid culture and species isolation processes that are time and labor consuming, which has, in turn, enabled a dynamic, large-scale comprehensive analysis. Lastly, 3) it helps detect difficult-to-culture microbes, particularly when combined with enhanced urine culture techniques [29]. This paper reviews the current and future NGS techniques for urinary microbiome analysis.

1) Amplicon sequencing vs. metagenomics

Currently, amplicon sequencing is the most commonly used method for microbiome analysis. The 16S rRNA gene has been most commonly used for urinary microbiome analysis. The 16S rRNA gene comprises nine hypervariable segments (V1-V9) flanked by highly conserved regions. Amplicon sequencing is based on the fact that a universal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primer can target these highly conserved regions across diverse species to amplify the gene in the sample. After amplifying the 16S rRNA gene conserved region, the attached variable regions are sequen-ced to gather information regarding the presence/abun-dance of specific microorganism taxa, or “operational taxonomic units” (OTUs). The OTU counts refer to the relative abundances of each organism in the analyzed sample. In addition, the bioinformatics analysis pipeline allows the construction of phylogenetic trees from representative sequences of OTUs and downstream statistical analyses. Nevertheless, a few disadvantages exist. In general, sequencing one or two of the nine hypervariable regions is only sufficient to achieve taxonomic classification at the family or genus level (the bacterial community can be classified by multiple taxonomic levels: domain > phylum > class > order > family > genus > species). Furthermore, the pre-amplification step by PCR could lead to bias in the abundance–presence results. Metagenomic sequencing is an option if higher taxonomic resolution and functional information are required. Because metagenomics methods sequence the full genome, it results in much more extensive data than amplicon sequencing, which also affects the speed and difficulty of downstream analyses.

(1) Use of amplicon sequencing in urinary microbiome research: Human urine is considered a sample of the low-biomass bacterial community, which can affect the quality of microbiota analysis results significantly [44,45]. Amplicon sequencing targeting bacterial-specific genomic sites reduces unnecessarily abundant host (human) DNA and helps accurately assess the urinary microbiota. Moreover, the sample collection and storage conditions can affect the results. Bundgaard-Nielsen et al. [46] investigated whether the collection and storage conditions influenced the urinary microbial composition. They found no day-to-day variations in the urinary microbiota composition. Furthermore, samples stored at -80℃ and -20℃, but not 4℃, were comparable to freshly handled voided urine.

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a risk factor for recurrent UTIs and a deterioration of the renal function. Vitko et al. [47] performed 16S rRNA sequencing of urine samples from VUR patients. In VUR patients, Dorea and Escherichia were dominant, and Prevotella and Lactobacillus were depleted. Furthermore, the microbial composition varied according to the recurrent febrile UTI status, suggesting the pathological remodeling of urinary bacterial communities after UTIs.

Ureteral stent encrustation is a rare but severe complication. Bacterial film formation is a likely cause of initiating stent encrustation. Kait et al. [48] profiled the microbiota of patients with indwelling ureteral stents using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. They collected the ureteral stent, cut the distal end bladder tip, and extracted DNA together with separately collected midstream urine. They used sequence variant (SV) count tables instead of OTUs, which provide improved accuracy in terms of the taxonomic classification and are directly comparable across different studies. The stent microbiota is stable and reproducible, and the most abundant SVs were the bacterial genera, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Escherichia. Contrary to common beliefs, antibiotics use and having no prior history of UTI were not correlated with the stent microbiota, but were associated with the patients’ comorbidities. This suggests that prophylactic antibiotics are not enough to prevent ureteral stent-associated complications, such as bacterial infection and encrustation [48].

(2) Metagenomics sequencing in urinary microbiome research: 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing is often limited to family and genus level resolution, presenting challenges to species-level identification. Metagenomics reads sequences from entire genomes within the genetic pool, which provides higher taxonomic resolution and the detection of non-bacterial species and functional levels, such as the presence of multidrug-resistance genes within the microbial community [49,50]. In healthy subjects, bacteriophages and human papillomaviruses are found frequently in urinary virome analysis [51]. In immun-ocompromised hosts, such as organ transplantation patients, the viral etiology serves as a significant fraction of the urinary tract and systemic infectious complications [50]. Moustafa et al. [52] used metagenomic sequencing to detect Ureaplasma, Candida, or Trichomonas vaginalis, as well as viruses, such as herpes virus, human papillomavirus, or polyomavirus, all of which were undetectable by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Furthermore, paired metagenomic sequencing of the urine from transplant recipients and donors revealed the frequent occurrence of the JC polyomavirus in samples from donors and transmission to their corresponding recipients [53]. This suggests that conventional diagnostic tools for virus detection do not cover the full spectrum of the urinary virome. In another study, in kidney transplant recipients with or without bacterial/viral UTIs, urinary cell-free DNA metagenomics sequencing uncovered the presence of bacteria and viruses that were not detected using conventional diagnostic protocols [54].

2) Short-read vs. long-read sequencing in microbiome analysis

Recently, “newer” generation sequencing devices have been developed and rapidly adapted to the field of clinical and basic genomic research. In particular, “long-read” sequencing techniques commercialized by Pacific Bio-sciences or Oxford Nanopore have shown potential in microbiome analysis. Despite the relatively less accurate base-calling ability, the “long-read” sequencers generate 10,000-100,000 bp reads, which are 10-100 times larger than the current standard “short-read” sequencers, providing 200-500 bp. This is beneficial for assigning each read to specific bacterial taxa [55]. For 16S rRNA gene sequencing, long-read sequencing (LRS) reads the full-length 16S rRNA gene at once (the target 16S gene is approximately 1,500 bp in length), providing a direct representation of the taxa. By contrast, short read sequencing identifies smaller segments of the hypervariable regions (e.g., V1-2, V3-5, or V6-9).

Although there are no reports of applying long-read 16S rRNA or metagenomics sequencing in the urinary microbiome analysis, the results from non-urogenital microbiota studies may help guide future studies [23,24,56]. Wei et al. [57] compared LRS and short-read sequencing (SRS) technologies for conventional 16S rRNA sequencing (V3–V4 reads) of genomic DNA from fecal samples. The two tools provided similar classification results at the genus or species level. Matsuo et al. [55] tested LRS and SRS for sequencing the full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon of mock and human fecal samples. Compared to the V3–V4 region, the full-length data of the hypervariable regions provided significantly improved accuracy for taxa classification. When LRS full-length and SRS full-length were compared, they provided similar results at the taxa level, LRS, and SRS. At the species level, however, LRS showed better resolution for certain species identification [55,58]. Nevertheless, in the other species, such as Bacillus or Escherichia, a sequence of LRS or SRS could not provide species-level resolution information owing to the inter-species similarity in their full-length 16S gene sequences [59].

Metagenomics provides a closer representation of the bacterial community diversity and dynamics than amplicon sequencing. While short-read data performs well in classifying bacterial communities, long-read data can enhance the accuracy in identifying non-bacterial or newly discovered bacterial species [60,61]. This is partly because of the nature of input DNA, where SRS uses short, regularly fragmented nucleotides, whereas LRS uses long native DNA or RNA [62]. This often leads to a complete single-contig genome of bacterial species, which is smaller than the average contig length of the LRS data [63]. Despite this, there are only a few papers reporting long-read metagenomics. Driscol et al. [64] performed a shotgun metagenomics analysis using the Pacific Bioscience platform. They reported three complete bacterial genome data of previously unknown species from a co-culture from a lake. The conventional SRS approach (Illumina) resulted in an approximately 7% gap in the genomes, where many essential and functional genes were located. SRS could not identify their structure because these regions were filled with repetitive sequences. Warwick-Dugdale et al. [65] utilized another LRS platform, “Oxford nanopore MinION”, for viral metagenomics. Unlike the bacterial community, many viral species lack reference genomes, and there is no established “universal” gene marker, such as 16S rRNA for bacteria for a low-resolution surveillance study. LRS can help distinguish the origin of viral nucleotides between similar strains and assemble a viral genome from a complex community. Compared to the SRS approach, LRS provides a more complete assembly of the viral genome, captures the microdiversity of the viral population, and is more cost-effective. Irinyi et al. [60] utilized the MinION to characterize the fungal community, mycobiome. They aimed to identify Pneumocystis jirovecii, which could be identified only by direct microscopic examination or real-time quantitative PCR because of its difficult culturing. LRS metagenomics revealed the presence of P. jirovecii and the associated mycobiome, which included Aspergillus or Cryptococcus, which could become a source of secondary, recurrent infections. For the bacteriophage community, where most genomic data are incomplete, Kiguchi et al. [66] reported that LRS technology helped detect fragmentations in the phage genomic data from SRS, particularly near repeat sequences and hypervariable regions. Yahara et al. [67] also studied the “oral phageome” using LRS metagenomics and observed several new complete assemblies of viral genomes, as well as the interaction of the phages and the host bacteria [68].

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the microbial diversity and interactions with the host immune system is crucial for properly managing UTIs. Historically, a urine sample that shows no growth in the standard culture technique was considered “sterile”. On the other hand, the recent advances in sequencing technologies revealed the existence of a urinary microbiome. Furthermore, urinary microbiome dysbiosis is associated with infections and lower urinary tract symptoms, urolithiasis, and cancer. Considerable heterogeneity of the urinary microbiome exists across otherwise healthy hosts related to age, sex, prior medications, or non-urogenital systemic conditions. There are several technical challenges in the genomic analysis of the urine microbiome, including bias from DNA primers, amplification, sample conta-mination, or simply insufficient background genetic information about the microbes. Newer generation sequencers, such as LRS, may help rebuild the microbial genome and detect clinical and biological significant variations.

NOTES

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

H.H. and J.Y.L. participated in data collection, designed the study, and wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

REFERENCES

1. Pairo-Castineira E, Clohisey S, Klaric L, Bretherick AD, Rawlik K, Pasko D, et al. Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in COVID-19. Nature 2021;591:92-8. PubMed
2. Plenge RM. Molecular underpinnings of severe coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA 2020;324:638-9. Article PubMed
3. Zhang Q, Bastard P, Liu Z, Le Pen J, Moncada-Velez M, Chen J, et al. Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science 2020;370:eabd4570.PubMed PMC
4. Plante JA, Liu Y, Liu J, Xia H, Johnson BA, Lokugamage KG, et al. Spike mutation D614G alters SARS-CoV-2 fitness. Nature 2021;592:116-21; Erratum. Article PubMed PDF
5. Abraham SN, Miao Y. The nature of immune responses to urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Immunol 2015;15:655-63. Article PubMed PMC PDF
6. Ambite I, Butler D, Wan MLY, Rosenblad T, Tran TH, Chao SM, et al. Molecular determinants of disease severity in urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol 2021;18:468-86. Article PubMed PMC PDF
7. Fischer H, Lutay N, Yadav M, Urbano A, et al. Ragnarsdóttir B. Jönsson K. Pathogen specific, IRF3-dependent signaling and innate resistance to human kidney infection. PLoS Pathog 2010;6:e1001109. Article PubMed PMC
8. Hawn TR, Scholes D, Li SS, Wang H, Yang Y, Roberts PL, et al. Toll-like receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to urinary tract infections in adult women. PLoS One 2009;4:e5990. Article PubMed PMC
9. Subashchandrabose S, Mobley HLT. Virulence and fitness determinants of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr 2015;3:10. Article PDF
10. Hull RA, Rudy DC, Donovan WH, Wieser IE, Stewart C, Darouiche RO. Virulence properties of Escherichia coli 83972, a prototype strain associated with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Infect Immun 1999;67:429-32. Article PubMed PMC PDF
11. Ljunggren E, Wullt B. Sundén F. Håkansson L. Escherichia coli 83972 bacteriuria protects against recurrent lower urinary tract infections in patients with incomplete bladder emptying. J Urol 2010;184:179-85. Article PubMed
12. Roos V, Ulett GC, Schembri MA, Klemm P. The asymptomatic bacteriuria Escherichia coli strain 83972 outcompetes uropathogenic E. Infect Immun 2006;74:615-24. Article PubMed PMC PDF
13. Heytens S, De Sutter A, Coorevits L, Cools P, Boelens J, Van Simaey L, et al. Women with symptoms of a urinary tract infection but a negative urine culture: PCR-based quantification of Escherichia coli suggests infection in most cases. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:647-52. Article PubMed
14. Mayne AIW, Davies PSE, Simpson JM. Antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to hip and knee arthroplasty; a systematic review of the literature. Surgeon 2018;16:176-82. Article PubMed
15. Garretto A, Miller-Ensminger T, Ene A, Merchant Z, Shah A, Gerodias A, et al. Genomic survey of E. Front Microbiol 2020;11:2094. PubMed PMC
16. Ackerman AL, Chai TC. The bladder is not sterile: an update on the urinary microbiome. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 2019;14:331-41. Article PubMed PMC PDF
17. McDonald M, Kameh D, Johnson ME, Johansen TEB, Albala D, Mouraviev V. A head-to-head comparative phase II study of standard urine culture and sensitivity versus DNA next-generation sequencing testing for urinary tract infections. Rev Urol 2017;19:213-20. PubMed PMC
18. Dornbier RA, Bajic P, Van Kuiken M, Jardaneh A, Lin H, Gao X, et al. The microbiome of calcium-based urinary stones. Urolithiasis 2020;48:191-9. Article PubMed PDF
19. Flannigan R, Choy WH, Chew B, Lange D. Renal struvite stones--pathogenesis, microbiology, and management strategies. Nat Rev Urol 2014;11:333-41; Erratum. Article PubMed PDF
20. Bajic P, Wolfe AJ, Gupta GN. The urinary microbiome: implications in bladder cancer pathogenesis and therapeutics. Urology 2019;126:10-5. Article PubMed
21. DeMasi M, Barry E, Watts K, Aboumohamed A. The role of the urinary, fecal, and prostatic microbiome in prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 2020;203:e970.
22. Kuleshov V, Jiang C, Zhou W, Jahanbani F, Batzoglou S, Snyder M. Synthetic long-read sequencing reveals intraspecies diversity in the human microbiome. Nat Biotechnol 2016;34:64-9. Article PubMed PDF
23. Oberle A, Urban L, Falch-Leis S, Ennemoser C, Nagai Y, Ashikawa K, et al. 16S rRNA long-read nanopore sequencing is feasible and reliable for endometrial microbiome analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2021;42:1097-107. Article PubMed
24. Toma I, Siegel MO, Keiser J, Yakovleva A, Kim A, Davenport L, et al. Single-molecule long-read 16S sequencing to characterize the lung microbiome from mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:3913-21. Article PubMed PMC PDF
25. Wolfe AJ, Toh E, Shibata N, Rong R, Kenton K, Fitzgerald M, et al. Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:1376-83. Article PubMed PMC PDF
26. Siddiqui H, Nederbragt AJ, Lagesen K, Jeansson SL, Jakobsen KS. Assessing diversity of the female urine microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons. BMC Microbiol 2011;11:244. Article PubMed PMC PDF
27. Lewis DA, Brown R, Williams J, White P, Jacobson SK, Marchesi JR, et al. The human urinary microbiome; bacterial DNA in voided urine of asymptomatic adults. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2013;3:41. Article PubMed PMC
28. Pickard JM, Zeng MY, Caruso R. Núñez G. Gut microbiota: role in pathogen colonization, immune responses, and infla-mmatory disease. Immunol Rev 2017;279:70-89. Article PubMed PMC PDF
29. Hilt EE, McKinley K, Pearce MM, Rosenfeld AB, Zilliox MJ, Mueller ER, et al. Urine is not sterile: use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:871-6. Article PubMed PMC PDF
30. Bajic P, Van Kuiken ME, Burge BK, Kirshenbaum EJ, Joyce CJ, Wolfe AJ, et al. Male bladder microbiome relates to lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol Focus 2020;6:376-82. Article PubMed
31. Siddiqui H, Lagesen K, Nederbragt AJ, Jeansson SL, Jakobsen KS. Alterations of microbiota in urine from women with interstitial cystitis. BMC Microbiol 2012;12:205. Article PubMed PMC PDF
32. Adebayo AS, Ackermann G, Bowyer RCE, Wells PM, Humphreys G, Knight R, et al. The urinary tract microbiome in older women exhibits host genetic and environmental influences. Cell Host Microbe 2020;28:298-305.e3. Article PubMed
33. Fouts DE, Pieper R, Szpakowski S, Pohl H, Knoblach S, Suh MJ, et al. Integrated next-generation sequencing of 16S rDNA and metaproteomics differentiate the healthy urine microbiome from asymptomatic bacteriuria in neuropathic bladder associated with spinal cord injury. J Transl Med 2012;10:174. Article PubMed PMC PDF
34. Fredsgaard L, Thorsteinsson K, Bundgaard-Nielsen C, Ammitzbøll N, Leutscher P, Chai Q, et al. Description of the voided urinary microbiota in asymptomatic prepubertal children - a pilot study. J Pediatr Urol 2021;17:545.e1-8. PubMed
35. Glover M, Moreira CG, Sperandio V, Zimmern P. Recurrent urinary tract infections in healthy and nonpregnant women. Urol Sci 2014;25:1-8. Article PubMed PMC
36. Chen SL, Wu M, Henderson JP, Hooton TM, Hibbing ME, Hultgren SJ, et al. Genomic diversity and fitness of E. Sci Transl Med 2013;5:184ra60. PubMed PMC
37. Mulder M, Radjabzadeh D, Hassing RJ, Heeringa J, Uitterlinden AG, Kraaij R, et al. The effect of antimicrobial drug use on the composition of the genitourinary microbiota in an elderly population. BMC Microbiol 2019;19:9. Article PubMed PMC PDF
38. Gottschick C, Deng ZL, Vital M, Masur C, Abels C, Pieper DH, et al. The urinary microbiota of men and women and its changes in women during bacterial vaginosis and antibiotic treatment. Microbiome 2017;5:99. PubMed PMC
39. Rani A, Ranjan R, McGee HS, Andropolis KE, Panchal DV, Hajjiri Z, et al. Urinary microbiome of kidney transplant patients reveals dysbiosis with potential for antibiotic resistance. Transl Res 2017;181:59-70. Article PubMed
40. Josephs-Spaulding J, Krogh TJ, Rettig HC, Lyng M, Chkonia M, Waschina S, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infections: unraveling the complicated environment of uncomplicated rUTIs. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021;11:562525. Article PubMed PMC
41. Schilling JD, Lorenz RG, Hultgren SJ. Effect of trimeth-oprim-sulfamethoxazole on recurrent bacteriuria and bacterial persistence in mice infected with uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 2002;70:7042-9. Article PubMed PMC PDF
42. Cai T, Bartoletti R. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in recurrent UTI - to treat or not to treat. GMS Infect Dis 2017;5:Doc09. PubMed PMC
43. Cai T, Mazzoli S, Lanzafame P, Caciagli P, Malossini G, Nesi G, et al. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in clinical urological practice: preoperative control of bacteriuria and management of recurrent UTI. Pathogens 2016;5:4. Article PubMed PMC
44. Marotz CA, Sanders JG, Zuniga C, Zaramela LS, Knight R, Zengler K. Improving saliva shotgun metagenomics by chemical host DNA depletion. Microbiome 2018;6:42. Article PubMed PMC PDF
45. Hasan MR, Rawat A, Tang P, Jithesh PV, Thomas E, Tan R, et al. Depletion of human DNA in spiked clinical specimens for improvement of sensitivity of pathogen detection by next-generation sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 2016;54:919-27. Article PubMed PMC PDF
46. Bundgaard-Nielsen C, Ammitzbøll N, Isse YA, Muqtar A, Jensen AM, Leutscher PDC, et al. Voided urinary microbiota is stable over time but impacted by post void storage. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020;10:435. PubMed PMC
47. Vitko D, McQuaid JW, Gheinani AH, Hasegawa K, DiMartino S, Davis KH, et al. Urinary tract infections in children with vesicoureteral reflux are accompanied by alterations in urinary microbiota and metabolome profiles. Eur Urol 2022;81:151-4. Article PubMed
48. Al KF, Denstedt JD, Daisley BA, Bjazevic J, Welk BK, Pautler SE, et al. Ureteral stent microbiota is associated with patient comorbidities but not antibiotic exposure. Cell Rep Med 2020;1:100094. Article PubMed PMC
49. Jones-Freeman B, Chonwerawong M, Marcelino VR, Deshpande AV, Forster SC, Starkey MR. The microbiome and host mucosal interactions in urinary tract diseases. Mucosal Immunol 2021;14:779-92. Article PubMed PDF
50. Salabura A, Łuniewski A, Kucharska M, Myszak D, Ciechanowski K, et al. Dołęgowska B. Urinary tract virome as an urgent target for metagenomics. Life (Basel) 2021;11:1264. PubMed PMC
51. Santiago-Rodriguez TM, Ly M, Bonilla N, Pride DT. The human urine virome in association with urinary tract infections. Front Microbiol 2015;6:14. Article PubMed PMC
52. Moustafa A, Li W, Singh H, Moncera KJ, Torralba MG, Yu Y, et al. Microbial metagenome of urinary tract infection. Sci Rep 2018;8:4333. Article PubMed PMC PDF
53. Schreiber PW, Kufner V, Schmutz S, Zagordi O, Kaur A, et al. Hübel K. Metagenomic virome sequencing in living donor and recipient kidney transplant pairs revealed JC polyomavirus transmission. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69:987-94. Article PubMed
54. Burnham P, Dadhania D, Heyang M, Chen F, Westblade LF, Suthanthiran M, et al. Urinary cell-free DNA is a versatile analyte for monitoring infections of the urinary tract. Nat Commun 2018;9:2412. PubMed PMC
55. Matsuo Y, Komiya S, Yasumizu Y, Yasuoka Y, Mizushima K, Takagi T, et al. Full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis of human gut microbiota using MinION^™ nanopore sequencing confers species-level resolution. BMC Microbiol 2021;21:35. Article PubMed PMC PDF
56. van der Loos L, Leliaert F, Willems A, De Clerck O. Characterizing the ulva microbiome with long-reads from nanopore sequencing. Proceedings of the 12th International Phycological Congress, Puerto Varas, Chile, 2021;
57. Wei PL, Hung CS, Kao YW, Lin YC, Lee CY, Chang TH, et al. Characterization of fecal microbiota with clinical specimen using long-read and short-read sequencing platform. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:7110. Article PubMed PMC
58. Kai S, Matsuo Y, Nakagawa S, Kryukov K, Matsukawa S, Tanaka H, et al. Rapid bacterial identification by direct PCR ampli-fication of 16S rRNA genes using the MinION^™ nanopore sequencer. FEBS Open Bio 2019;9:548-57. PubMed PMC
59. Lukjancenko O, Wassenaar TM, Ussery DW. Comparison of 61 sequenced Escherichia coli genomes. Microb Ecol 2010;60:708-20. Article PubMed PMC
60. Irinyi L, Hu Y, Hoang MTV, Pasic L, Halliday C, Jayawardena M, et al. Long-read sequencing based clinical metagenomics for the detection and confirmation of Pneumocystis jirovecii directly from clinical specimens: a paradigm shift in mycological diagnostics. Med Mycol 2020;58:650-60. Article PubMed PDF
61. Pearman WS, Freed NE, Silander OK. Testing the advantages and disadvantages of short- and long- read eukaryotic metagenomics using simulated reads. BMC Bioinformatics 2020;21:220. Article PubMed PMC PDF
62. Beaulaurier J, Luo E, Eppley JM, Uyl PD, Dai X, Burger A, et al. Assembly-free single-molecule sequencing recovers complete virus genomes from natural microbial communities. Genome Res 2020;30:437-46. PubMed PMC
63. Francino O. Cuscó A. Pérez D. Viñes J. Fàbregas N. Long-read metagenomics retrieves complete single-contig bacterial genomes from canine feces. BMC Genomics 2021;22:330. PubMed PMC
64. Driscoll CB, Otten TG, Brown NM, Dreher TW. Towards long-read metagenomics: complete assembly of three novel genomes from bacteria dependent on a diazotrophic cyanobacterium in a freshwater lake co-culture. Stand Genomic Sci 2017;12:9. Article PubMed PMC PDF
65. Warwick-Dugdale J, Solonenko N, Moore K, Chittick L, Gregory AC, Allen MJ, et al. Long-read viral metagenomics captures abundant and microdiverse viral populations and their niche-defining genomic islands. PeerJ 2019;7:e6800. Article PubMed PMC PDF
66. Kiguchi Y, Nishijima S, Kumar N, Hattori M, Suda W. Long-read metagenomics of multiple displacement amplified DNA of low-biomass human gut phageomes by SACRA pre-processing chimeric reads. DNA Res 2021;28:dsab019; Erratum. PubMed PMC
67. Yahara K, Suzuki M, Hirabayashi A, Suda W, Hattori M, Suzuki Y, et al. Long-read metagenomics using PromethION uncovers oral bacteriophages and their interaction with host bacteria. Nat Commun 2021;12:27. Article PubMed PMC PDF
68. Van Goethem MW, Osborn AR, Bowen BP, Andeer PF, Swenson TL, Clum A, et al. Long-read metagenomics of soil communities reveals phylum-specific secondary metabolite dynamics. Commun Biol 2021;4:1302. PubMed PMC

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format: