Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Urogenit Tract Infect : Urogenital Tract Infection

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Urogenit Tract Infect > Volume 14(3); 2019 > Article
Original Article Early Experiences of a Minimal Invasive Intra-Prostatic Implant, Prostatic Urethral Lift for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment in Korea
Jonghyup Yang, Dongho Shin, Jaewoo Sung, Shinjay Cho, Sungmin Kang, Hyun Cheol Jeong, Sae Woong Choi, Woong Jin Bae, Sae Woong Kim
Urogenital Tract Infection 2019;14(3):80-86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14777/uti.2019.14.3.80
Published online: December 31, 2019
Department of Urology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
1Department of Urology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul,
2Department of Urology, The Catholic University of Korea, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Received: 30 May 2019   • Revised: 4 September 2019   • Accepted: 9 October 2019
prev next
  • 10 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Purpose: As a minimal invasive device for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment, prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is widely accepted worldwide but not widely used in Korea. We investigated the one-year results of for patients with BPH in Korea.
Materials and Methods: From April 2017 to June 2018, 42 patients with BPH were treated with PUL under local anesthesia with sedation. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urinary flow rate and post-void residual (PVR) were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months later.
Results: Mean age was 69.57±8.58 years old, and mean prostatic volume was 37.17±12.19 cc. Preoperative total IPSS and quality of life (QOL) were 19.94±7.81 and 3.69±1.30, respectively. Total IPSS improved to 11.26±7.22 (p<0.001), and QOL was 2.42±1.43 (p=0.01) after one month. Patients showed no evidence of inflammation related to the implants. IPSS and QOL were somewhat worse after 3 months but were better than baseline at 6 and 12 months. Preoperative maximum flow rate (Qmax) was 9.71±5.45 ml/sec, and one month after surgery, it had improved to 12.63±7.33 (p=0.01); it remained good at 3, 6, and 12 months (12.63±7.38, 12.45±7.39, 14.73±9.67). PVR was not significant at any points postoperative (80.61±67.91 to 43.95±8.19, p=0.119). No patient reported retrograde ejaculation, erectile dysfunction or urinary tract infection.
Conclusions: We evaluated the one-year efficacy of PUL for BPH treatment in Korea, and found significant improvement of IPSS, QOL and Qmax. It is expected that not only the improvement of voiding symptom but also the preservation of sexual function with a low risk of adverse events.

  • Cite
    CITE
    export Copy Download
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Early Experiences of a Minimal Invasive Intra-Prostatic Implant, Prostatic Urethral Lift for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment in Korea
    Urogenit Tract Infect. 2019;14(3):80-86.   Published online December 31, 2019
    Close

Urogenit Tract Infect : Urogenital Tract Infection
Close layer
TOP